Transform the citizen’s role
In public funding.
RETHINK TANK · ORIGINAL CONCEPT, 2024
PROSPERA
Reimagining taxation. Empowering the future.
PROSPERA · THE BIGGER STORY
In 2024, we imagined a different relationship between citizens and taxation.
Then we put the idea to the test.
Using ReVision, our AI-powered simulation and intelligence platform, we explored how society, political stakeholders and institutions might respond. Not simply to validate the idea, but to challenge its assumptions, uncover vulnerabilities and reveal the questions that needed answering.
Because imagining a better future is only the beginning.
THE ORIGINAL 2024 VISION
Reimagining taxation.
Empowering the future.
THE PROBLEM
Citizens view taxation in Greece as an obligation
without a direct benefit to their daily lives.
Source references in the original concept: Metron Analysis (2024) and Kapa Research.
WHAT CITIZENS EXPECT
Citizens demand transparency and equity
in tax management for the common good.
Source references in the original concept: Metron Analysis (2024) and Kapa Research.
THE PROPOSITION
From an obligation
to a choice with meaningful impact.
PROSPERA aims to redefine how citizens perceive taxation.
A CHANGE IN PERSPECTIVE
TODAYIncome Tax
→REIMAGINEDCitizen Contribution
TWO COMPLEMENTARY PURPOSES
A dual-purpose initiative.
Create new channels
For additional, targeted contributions.
THE MODEL / THREE DISTINCT IDEAS
How would PROSPERA work?
Citizen choice and additional public funding are related, but not the same thing.
Existing taxes
Mandatory taxation remains the foundation of public funding.
Citizen influence
The concept explores giving citizens a say over an eligible portion of public spending.
Voluntary funding
Optional, targeted contributions could support additional projects.
Conceptual mechanisms from the original proposal; their legal and fiscal design has not been established.
CITIZEN CHOICE
Citizens can choose where their annual contributions go.
And follow how they support specific public purposes.
30%Education
30%Health
20%Infrastructure
20%Environment
TRANSPARENCY
From contribution to outcome.
Follow how funds are assigned, spent and translated into measurable results.
TRACKING & TRANSPARENCY LAYER
SecureTime-stampedVisible
01
Citizen contribution
A contribution is submitted and assigned a unique record.
02
Blockchain record
The transaction is time-stamped and securely recorded.
03
Project allocation
Funds are routed to the selected public purpose.
04
Live status
Progress can be monitored in real time through updates.
05
Outcome report
Results are published through detailed reporting.
Transparent reporting first. Blockchain could support an auditable record.
OUTCOME-BASED RECIPROCITY
Social investments, not anonymous payments.
Contributors could receive tax credits or other financial benefits if supported projects meet specified performance outcomes.
The approach draws on Social Impact Bond (SIB) principles, linking benefits to measurable results.
POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL REVENUE
€300–500M
Potential additional government revenue from voluntary contributions, depending on participation.
Potentially reducing the need for borrowing.
Original 2024 concept scenario based on budget assumptions. Participation rates and contribution amounts need validation.
ECONOMIC IMPACT & JOB CREATION
Contributions can create wider economic value.
Funding infrastructure, local development and social programs could stimulate economic activity and jobs, increasing revenues through incomes and consumption.
Public contributions→Investment & local projects→Employment & activity→Income and consumption→Tax revenues
36-MONTH PLAYBOOK
From preparation to national scale.
Preparation
Needs analysis and technical design
Pilot implementation
Initial implementation and optimization
National expansion
Deployment across the country
The original conceptual roadmap, subject to feasibility, legal and fiscal checks.
REVISION / STRESS TEST
What if we could challenge an idea before implementing it?
ReVision explores potential reactions across a synthetic Greek audience and simulated stakeholder perspectives.
The original 2024 exercise tested the concept's assumptions. These outputs are AI-generated scenarios, not fieldwork or forecasts.
AI-SIMULATED PUBLIC OPINION
How would you feel if income tax were renamed “Citizen Contribution”?
30%
More positive, connected to society
25%
No change in view of taxes
20%
Enthusiastic and proud to participate
15%
The name does not matter
7%
Opposed: just a communications trick
3%
Other / no opinion
Public opinion simulation through ReVision, using a synthetic population based on the characteristics of Greek society.
SIMULATED AUDIENCE SEGMENTS
Different groups. Different reactions.
More positive
Simulated higher positive perception among younger people seeking participatory governance, especially in Attica and Thessaloniki.
More reserved
Older age groups and rural areas were modeled as more skeptical or indifferent, emphasizing taxes as a legal obligation.
Communications skepticism
Those with lower institutional trust were modeled as more likely to see a rebranding exercise.
Public opinion simulation through ReVision, using a synthetic population based on the characteristics of Greek society.
FIVE KEY CONCERNS
What could hold the idea back?
Lack of trust
Fear of opaque management and funds not being used as promised.
Implementation difficulty
Doubts that citizen preferences and intended results can be delivered.
Communications gimmick
Concern that renaming taxes merely improves their image.
Inequality
Fear that affluent or urban regions might benefit disproportionately.
Resistance to change
Skepticism, especially in rural and semi-urban communities.
ReVision public opinion simulation using a synthetic population. Concern categories may overlap, so the percentages should not be added together.
REVISION / PERSPECTIVE TEST
Leadership perspectives.
The concept is challenged through simulated stakeholder viewpoints.
Political and institutional viewpoints simulated through ReVision. These are model-generated assessments, not actual statements or endorsements.
SIMULATED POLITICAL CRITIQUE
Six ways the proposal could be challenged.
Transparency
Lack of effective institutional controls could invite mismanagement.
Fiscal responsibility
Citizen-directed allocation might threaten essential services and budget stability.
Social justice
Affluent or urban areas might gain at the expense of vulnerable communities.
Advantages for the wealthy
Tax benefits could privilege higher-income contributors.
Communications exercise
Rebranding without substantive reform would be superficial.
Implementation plan
General promises need evidence-backed operational steps.
ReVision simulation of political reactions using synthetic profiles. The objections are model-generated assessments, not actual statements.
SIMULATED EUROPEAN POLICY PERSPECTIVE
A wider institutional stress test.
Inequality
Wealthier citizens and regions could influence spending disproportionately.
Distrust
The public could view the scheme as a rebranding of taxation.
Revenue stability
Voluntary contributions could fluctuate and affect fiscal commitments.
Digital barriers
Blockchain and advanced tools could exclude some citizens.
Complexity
Personalized allocation would carry administrative costs.
Behavior
Visible causes might win out over less glamorous essential services.
Institutional perspective simulated through ReVision using a synthetic profile of the President of the European Commission. The responses are model-generated assessments, not actual statements.
WHAT THE STRESS TEST REVEALED
A promising idea. Serious questions.
Potential
Choice and visibility could make public contribution more meaningful.
Tension
Trust and fairness matter more than a compelling new name.
Next step
Test budget protection, legal feasibility and participation in a controlled pilot.
These are conceptual implications of the original exploratory simulation, not observed public behavior.
REVISION CONCEPT RATING
7.4/10
REVISION RATING9/10
8/10
8/10
6/10
An ambitious initiative with strong potential, but success depends on resolving implementation risks and achieving measurable results.
Equality, clear communication and successful pilot programs were identified as conditions for progress.
Original illustrative concept assessment (2024), not a current or independently validated policy score.
RETHINK TANK · A CONCEPT STRESS TEST
PROSPERA
Imagine the possibility. Test the assumptions.
A visionary concept, evaluated through ReVision.
01 / 25 · RETHINK TANK · ORIGINAL CONCEPT, 2024